
Why “We’ll Decide Later” About a Parent’s Home Creates Legal and Family Risk in BC
The phrase that feels safe—but quietly multiplies conflict
If I had a dollar for every time a family said:“We’ll decide later. There’s no rush.”…about a parent’s home in Vancouver, I could buy half a block in Kerrisdale.On the surface, it sounds kind.Gentle.
Non-confrontational.Underneath, it’s one of the riskiest phrases in the entire senior-housing conversation.
What “We’ll Decide Later” Really Means
When families say “we’ll decide later,” they’re usually saying:- “We don’t want to feel this yet.”
- “We don’t want to upset Mom or Dad.”
- “We don’t want to trigger sibling conflict.”
Completely understandable.But here’s the uncomfortable truth:The decision isn’t actually being delayed.
It’s just being made later—under pressure, with fewer options.
How Delay Turns Into Legal Risk in BC
Here’s how this commonly plays out in Vancouver and across BC:- No clear written plan for the house
- No shared understanding of what happens if capacity changes
- No agreement on whether the home is:
- A care-funding source
- A future inheritance
- Or a mix of both
- A health event
- Cognitive decline
- Or death
- Executors step in
- Power of Attorney actions are scrutinized
- Old conversations are remembered… very differently
- “You sold too soon.”
- “You waited too long and wasted money.”
- “You took control without us.”
The Hidden Structural Problem
This isn’t really about emotions.It’s about structure.When families delay:- Authority is unclear — who decides, and when?
- Timing is fuzzy — what actually triggers action?
- Purpose is undefined — care funding, legacy, or both?
A Classic Vancouver Scenario
Three adult children.A parent in a long-owned Vancouver Special in East Van.Everyone says:“We’ll talk about the house later.”Years pass.Then:
- The parent’s cognition declines
- One child lives nearby and is heavily involved
- Two live farther away and are less involved
- Care
- Bills
- The house
- The other siblings feel blindsided
- They question price, timing, and spending
- Resentment hardens into legal tension
How to Replace “We’ll Decide Later” With Something Safer
You don’t need every answer today.But you do need a framework.
1. Define Triggers
Agree on what forces a decision to be revisited:- “If Mom has two significant falls…”
- “If the doctor advises no more living alone…”
- “If care costs exceed $X per month…”
2. Clarify Authority
- Who holds Power of Attorney?
- What decisions can they make alone?
- How will siblings be kept informed?
3. Clarify the Purpose of the Home
Ask—and answer—this explicitly:- Is the home primarily a care-funding asset?
- Is preserving equity for inheritance a major goal?
- Is safety and stability the top priority, full stop?
4. Document Agreements
Nothing fancy. Even a simple email recap helps:“Here’s what we agreed for now.”When something changes, you’re not arguing about the past—you’re following a plan.Key Takeaways
- “We’ll decide later” doesn’t avoid conflict—it defers and multiplies it
- In BC, unclear timing + unclear authority + a high-value property = real legal risk
- You don’t need every answer today—but you do need a shared map
A Calm Next Step
If your family is stuck in “we’ll decide later” around a Vancouver property:- Consider a short, structured family conversation
- Bring in your BC estate lawyer or financial planner to sanity-check the framework
- And if you want a neutral, real-estate-based view of your options—without pressure—I can help you walk through the scenarios before things get messy
Next Step: Request the Family Transition Map™ — a clarity-first timeline designed to protect families before pressure takes over.
Kevin Lynch Seniors' Property Transition Advisor Remax Crest Realty
Important note: This video is educational and informational only. It does not replace legal, tax, or financial advice. Estate planning outcomes vary, and professional guidance should be sought for individual situations.
